star wars "saga"

toys are cool. they are fun. you like to play with toys. no, not THOSE kinds of toys. well, okay, those are fun too...

Moderators: Zero, John Madden, Bob Ross, General Zod, Richard Simmons, Batman

User avatar
anarky
sometimes not actually existing
Posts: 18049
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Fucking shit up, yo!

Re: star wars

Post by anarky »

I'm not sure when the last SW figure I bought was. (I know who it was, but not when.) I haven't even looked in almost two weeks. And you know what? I don't really care. For the few figures I might actually want, I figure that I'd have to be at the store immediately after they're put out, since they're the only ones anyone will want. Plus, folks from the stores will hoard them. So why waste time, gas, and effort looking for them? And at the same time, why spend more than retail to get them online because the folks at Hasbro are fucking morons and the company would be bankrupt if it wasn't for fucktards spending money on that bastardization of the Transformers.
Image
*--For behavior unbecoming anyone, perpetrated in real time over an extended--AH, FUCK IT! MORE MALIBU, BITCHES!!
Senor JabbaJohnL
I HAVE THE POWER!!!
Posts: 2785
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 12:17 pm

Re: star wars

Post by Senor JabbaJohnL »

RS says that the final voting for the last wave of legends is now up, but I don't see it. They also say that the Bespin Guard won't have any ethnic changes and VOTC Han has been replaced by R3-A2.

Whatever.
Shit. I can't think of a good signature.
User avatar
jjreason
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 8151
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 1:14 am
Location: Out there somewhere.

Re: star wars

Post by jjreason »

Concept Grievous now available for preorder, only $16.49 per figure (plusmotherfuckingtaxesandapplicableshippingcharges). Fuck. That.
"Something inside me....."
User avatar
anarky
sometimes not actually existing
Posts: 18049
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Fucking shit up, yo!

Re: star wars

Post by anarky »

I was considering that, given I have all the other concept figures so far. But the concept isn't too different from reality, and it's not as interesting as the others.
Image
*--For behavior unbecoming anyone, perpetrated in real time over an extended--AH, FUCK IT! MORE MALIBU, BITCHES!!
User avatar
jjreason
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 8151
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 1:14 am
Location: Out there somewhere.

Re: star wars

Post by jjreason »

It looks (at least upon my quick perusal) quite a bit like my son's animated CW Grievous (at least the head). It took me less than 5 seconds to pass on it.
"Something inside me....."
User avatar
kidhuman
I HAVE THE POWER!!!
Posts: 3769
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 6:04 pm
Location: USA

Re: star wars

Post by kidhuman »

I aint getting that shit, its a load of crap, it doesnt fit the line of OT McFigures, so its a POS.
Image
User avatar
Ran
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: barking up the wrong tree

Re: star wars

Post by Ran »

I stopped at a Target before I went to school tonight. They had one of the new cantina aliens and I ended up not getting it. They had some legends. As I looked on the pegs, I saw 3 figures in the back with a battledroid on the corner of the card. KH told me a while back he was still looking for the battledroid. So, I reached for it, but it was the C-3PO. What the hell. Didn't they just re-release that figure last year?
User avatar
anarky
sometimes not actually existing
Posts: 18049
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Fucking shit up, yo!

Re: star wars

Post by anarky »

Yep. This is two years straight (and three years total) pegwarming for him. Leia Boushh is on her third consecutive pegwarming year. Hasbro just ain't bright.

I have the PT concept figures from a few years ago. But the concept Grievous isn't concept enough. If he looked like one of the early paintings, I'd get him. But he's just a realistic version of CW Grievous. Not worth $20+.
Image
*--For behavior unbecoming anyone, perpetrated in real time over an extended--AH, FUCK IT! MORE MALIBU, BITCHES!!
User avatar
Ran
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: barking up the wrong tree

Re: star wars

Post by Ran »

Is Hasbro talking with Sideshow about doing playsets/environments for the 3.75" line just their way of making money without taking any risk? Basically they're just selling the right to make SW stuff to that scale since they don't want to do it themselves.
User avatar
anarky
sometimes not actually existing
Posts: 18049
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Fucking shit up, yo!

Re: star wars

Post by anarky »

Who knows?

What concerns me is where the line is drawn. The moisture vaporator, for instance, could be seen as a playset (albeit a tiny one). So could the Queen's Starship or the Falcon. Are they?
Image
*--For behavior unbecoming anyone, perpetrated in real time over an extended--AH, FUCK IT! MORE MALIBU, BITCHES!!
User avatar
Ran
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: barking up the wrong tree

Re: star wars

Post by Ran »

It's Hasbro's license. They probably can do whatever they want, but didn't they say in one of the Q&As that they are losing money on the large accessories? There was some answer in one of the Q&As that made it sound like they were not going to be putting that many more large accessories in with regular figures.
User avatar
mabudon
I HAVE THE POWER!!!
Posts: 2771
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2002 5:23 pm
Location: Canada

Re: star wars

Post by mabudon »

I bet they lost money on accessories like Custom Choppers to be certain

Speaking of which, I find it kinda funny how "losing money" can also be used to describe situations where they weren't making as much as they could be making by simply letting the product become crappy- I know from seing some of the recent shit in the store, they MUST be saving money on pigment by making most of their figs semi-translucent- you could fucking READ through that Ceremony lukes shitty see-through face- seing the things in person finally made me realize just how blind SW collectors sem to have become overall
Vince, NO!!!!!

I just ripped off most of your pubes!!
User avatar
Ran
(includes alternate sneering hissy fit head sculpt)
Posts: 9079
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 1:46 pm
Location: barking up the wrong tree

Re: star wars

Post by Ran »

Ceremonial Luke is one of the many figures I've bought this year that lead to my decision to quit collecting. When I got home and opened it, I really wish I skipped it. His body is ok, but he's screwed from the neck up.
User avatar
kidhuman
I HAVE THE POWER!!!
Posts: 3769
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 6:04 pm
Location: USA

Re: star wars

Post by kidhuman »

What gets me about this whole losing money thing:

They say they raised prices over the years due to high oil prices and such, but yet havent changed MSRP in ten years(according to Q&A). How the hell does that make sense?

Secondly, they are losing money because of this...

They could have sold that same Luke for 7 bucks without the MV, granted no one would have bought it. They could have sold the MV's for 7 bucks a pop also and gotten money on it. They could have sold us the 2 cantina aliens sans the curved sections and made another BP with 3 repacks and include the curved sections there and made money that way. Thats my philosophy on how they lost money
Image
User avatar
anarky
sometimes not actually existing
Posts: 18049
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:50 pm
Location: Fucking shit up, yo!

Re: star wars

Post by anarky »

I skipped that Luke, since the one I got in '98 (or whenever) actually looks better!

I think it's funny that, from a big business perspective, "losing money" doesn't actually mean "losing money" in the sense you or I would use it. We'd think, "I spent $1000 to make these toys, and only got $400 back in sales. This line lost $600." They think, "We spent $1000 to make these, and we only got back $1300 when our projections said $2000 in returns. We lost $700."
Image
*--For behavior unbecoming anyone, perpetrated in real time over an extended--AH, FUCK IT! MORE MALIBU, BITCHES!!
Post Reply